There are a couple of background concepts that can help understand this.
First of all is the fact that "duration" has a precise technical definition
in project management that is much more restrictive than the everyday
meaning of the word. What you are describing - finish minus start - is
actually not duration at all even though that's the time period most people
usually have in mind when they use the word in day-to-day conversation.
What you have descibed is actually "elapsed time." In project managment,
"duration" is defined as the "number of working time units as defined by the
calendar governing the task between when work is first performed and when it
ends." That's why, when using the default calendar, a task that starts
Monday at 8am and finishes Tuesday at 5pm has 16 hours duration, not 33
hours. The hours in the time periods Mon 12n-1pm, Mon 5pm-Tue 8am, and Tue
12n-1pm don't count towards the duration. The non-working minutes are
deducted from the elapsed time to compute the duration.
Now lets look at what a resource assigned 100% is doing on that same Mon 8am
to Tue 5pm task. The number of time units he's working is also 16 hours
because he's not working lunches or overnight. What does the 16 hours
represent for him? That's his Work, except we use the units man-hours to
distinguish them from duration time units. 100% units means the resource
work and the task duration are equal and the "duration" of his assignment is
16 hours.
What if he's assigned 50%? The task duration is 16 hours but the work is 8
hours. That implies that out of those 16 hours when he could have been
working, for that resource 8 hours of them were non-working minutes. But
according to our definition of duration, non-working time is always deducted
from the elapsed time to produce the duration value. Now for the 50%
resource, the duration is the time btween Mon 8am and Tue 5pm, MINUS Mon
12n-1pm, Mon 5pm-Tue 8am, Tue 12n-1pm AND ALSO 8 more hours that he didn't
do productive work on the task during the overall timeframe - we don't know
which minutes were non-productive but we know they exist, otherwise we would
have more work output from him. In other words, his "duration" is still the
same as his Work.
So when you display the Work field in the Resource Usage view, you are, in
fact, displaying the duration of that assignment, elapsed time minus
non-working time. Again, be very careful not to confuse that number with
the task duration
--
Steve House [MVP]
MS Project Trainer & Consultant
Visit
http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs