Anton said:
Hi Rob
The plot thickens..
The scenario is as follows:
- 1 Master project plan
- 14 Sub project plans
- Pretty complex, as I'm sure you've gathered
- I'll do the ODBC thing
- However, the project work is done at two remote
locations, one of which doesn't have access to the LAN
where the mpp's are stored
In your opinion, would it be possible to do what you
advised but via the Internet? Would we be able to view
and update the project plan in this way?
Call me an optimist, but I do think that it will be
possible. Any idea on resources I can consult on how to
do this?
I'm quite sure it can work just fine for you, but there is a caveat: you
have to define what "via internet" means and design your system and work
process accordingly.
For example, what comes to mind immeidiately is the following:
1. For all 14 subprojects, all sites, design a "standard" for ODBC DSN
names and Project Title "property", and which files go into which MDB
(not MPP) files. Probably can consolidate to 2 MDB files ... one for
aeach site (assume you have two sites).
2. Implement this standard on all 14 subproject plans (changing to the
new link names) and redistribute the MDB files out
3. The people at the "remote" site without LAN access can put the MDB
file wherever they want ... their own LAN on on desk of a stand-alone
user. The *key* is to use the standard ODBC DSN names (step 1). People
in office(s) with LAN access access via the ODBC name (not file name)
which then allows to be located wherever they want to be, and
independant of task linkages inside Project.
4. At scheduled intervals, they take a copy of the MDB file, zip it,
and then email to the central location. At central location they unzip
it and put it into position wherever they want, pointed at by the
"standard" ODBC DSN. This received file, along with the MDB file(s)
stored locally, are then viewed/analyzed via the Master.
You have to realize you are having "snapshot" copies and you have to
work through the work process used to ensure people know what version of
what they have. It's not difficult and with a little care can be made
work easily. The alternative is to spend a lot of money on extra
bandwidth on the network to make the remote office part of the "LAN" ...
only you can judge the economics of that but my hunch is that's not
warranted.
Also consider what parts of the work process you can automate, e.g. the
movement of files on an appropriate interval (daily, weekly, etc.)
I know all this may sound daunting, but if you give it a try you'll see
how it all pulls together.