D
David W. Fenton
Well, OK, but I would appreciate it if you would tell me where and
how I was wrong.
Are you saying Access itself is a database? . . .
Of course not. Access is a development platform that includes a
database engine, Jet.
Any questions about whether or not Access is an RDBMS are,
therefore, about Jet, not about the Access parts. Thus, the fact
that Access can be used as a front end to client/server database
engines is not an aspect of the database part of Access.
Thus, it's completely irrelevant to the original question.
. . . What is Jet then? . . .
In Access as client to a server database, Jet is only involved
trivially, as a data access layer, not as a database engine. Thus,
that scenario has nothing to do with the question "Is Access an
RDBMS?"
. . . I've
based my answers on comments and discussion I've read here over
the years. And that is that Access is a development platform that
comes bpackaged with the Jet database engine and that it uses Jet
as a means to manipulate records displayed, say in a datasheet or
form. IE, when I use a Passthrough query to bring Oracle data
from the server to a client screen and I use the excellent built
in filters that I am using Jet to manipulate data on the client.
Nope. In that scenario, you're using Jet as a data access layer, not
as a database engine. The actual data processing is not handled by
Jet in that case (well, that's not entirely true if you write your
SQL badly).
Actually, I hadn't thought about that -- Jet does take over what it
can't figure out how to pass on to the server. This is, perhaps, a
unique aspect of Jet, the way in which it works cooperatively with
the remote server.
In any event, that's an aspect of Jet, not of the server database,
so it's still not making Jet into a server db, which was the
question you were attempting to answer (even though it was
completely irrelevant to the original question about whether or not
Access is an RDBMS).
Thanks in advance to you or anyone that can straighten me out on
this. Actually, given the tremendous amount of negativity on this
thread, perhaps if you can explain my "hash" and what would make
it right, then perhaps something positive can come of things,
after all?
The original two questions were confused, and, I believe, designed
to provoke, so I'm not certain there's much to be gained from trying
to answer them.
As far as the original poster goes, you may note I thought the
question was a homework question. Nevertheless, I prefer to treat
new people by assuming they are genuinely curious (or at VERY
worst, frustrated) as opposed to hostile. It's actually the way I
try to live in all aspects of life and I've done well from it.
I'm a happy bird, at least.
I think sinister is another of Don Mellon's sock puppets.