MS Word as Email Editor

[Andy K]

IS it worth while using MS words as my email editor under
Outlook 2003? What do most people use?

Andy K

 

[Jim]

It is more cumbersome (resources used) to use word - rich
text is recognized by just about everybody

 

[Chris Scharff [MVP]]

In the last exciting episode, "Andy K"

IS it worth while using MS words as my email editor under
Outlook 2003? What do most people use?

Depends on how you define worthwhile. Wordmail in Office 2003 is
greatly improved over previous versions IMO... but I tend to send in
just plain text, so it doesn't do anything for me personally.

--
Chris Scharff
MessageOne
http://www.messageone.com

-- ROT13 for valid SMTP address --

 

[Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]]

No, rich text (outlook's version) is recognized by almost no one. Using
word does not increase resources in 2003.

--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]

Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. Due to
the (insert latest virus name here) virus, all mail sent to my personal
account will be deleted without reading.


After scratching one's head,
Jim <[email protected]> asked this group:
| It is more cumbersome (resources used) to use word - rich
| text is recognized by just about everybody
|
|| -----Original Message-----
|| IS it worth while using MS words as my email editor under
|| Outlook 2003? What do most people use?
||
|| Andy K
|| .

 

[Brian Tillman]

IS it worth while using MS words as my email editor under
Outlook 2003? What do most people use?

That depends entirely on what you hope to accomplish. I, for example, never
use it because I would never subject my recipients to all the overhead that
comes with a Word-generated message.