password protected pages

S

Sharon

Does anyone have suggestions on add-ons so I can add
password protected pages to my website (employee access
pages). I have tried J-Bots PagePro and can't get it to
work and can't get support that I can understand.

Thank you.

sharon
 
J

Jim Cheshire

Sharon,

If you're using employee access pages, you might want to consider using the
security on the Web site. It's going to be much more reliable and robust
than any third-party solution because it uses the OS-level security.

Search on "frontpage password protect" in the Microsoft KB at
http://support.microsoft.com.

--
Jim Cheshire
Jimco Add-ins
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
===================================
Co-author of Special Edition
Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
 
T

Tom Pepper Willett

HOW TO: Apply Password Protection to Part of a Web Using FrontPage 2000
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;301554
--
-----
Tom Pepper Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
----
| Sharon,
|
| If you're using employee access pages, you might want to consider using
the
| security on the Web site. It's going to be much more reliable and robust
| than any third-party solution because it uses the OS-level security.
|
| Search on "frontpage password protect" in the Microsoft KB at
| http://support.microsoft.com.
|
| --
| Jim Cheshire
| Jimco Add-ins
| http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| ===================================
| Co-author of Special Edition
| Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
|
|
| | > Does anyone have suggestions on add-ons so I can add
| > password protected pages to my website (employee access
| > pages). I have tried J-Bots PagePro and can't get it to
| > work and can't get support that I can understand.
| >
| > Thank you.
| >
| > sharon
|
|
 
J

Jim Cheshire

The only secured sites I've developed were Intranet sites at work. Your
host should have the ability to secure part of your site via SSL.

--
Jim Cheshire
Jimco Add-ins
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
===================================
Co-author of Special Edition
Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
 
J

Jim Cheshire

Hi Jonered,

Sorry, I thought you were changing subjects and moving on to encrypting
data. Assuming you are still talking about password protecting, there are
many solutions available to you out there. I'd carefully examine the
license agreement with them however. Make sure that they will stand behind
whatever level of security they provide. You don't want to pay for a bug in
someone's product by opening a security hole in your site! Remember, by
using a product to do this, you are trusting your content with that company.

By far the best solution is to store usernames and passwords outside of your
Web site content area. Using SQL Server is the best and most secure
solution. However, if you must use Access, you should store your Access
database outside of your content area. You can store it in _private or some
other folder where it cannot be browsed directly, but then you must rely on
your host to properly secure that folder, and many hosts open up permissions
too much and allow people access to folders where they shouldn't be allowed.

My personal recommendation would be to find a reputable ASP site out there
that provides tutorials on this kind of thing and write your own. It's not
hard to do, and by doing it yourself, you are guaranteed to know exactly
what's going on.

--
Jim Cheshire
Jimco Add-ins
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
===================================
Co-author of Special Edition
Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
 
M

MD WebsUnlimited.com

What you're suggesting here is that the company that you work for (MS) has
developed a system that allows for security holes.

The first version of FP that offered a save results component saved the data
in _private and still does. Since the first version of FP that has offered
database results it saved the database in the web in known folders and not
outside of the web.

Most ISP / WPP do not allow for a file area outside of the web tree but if
they do then yes use it. It does not mean that the product you purchase can
not use that database. It does mean that you'll have to manually tweak the
code and that includes any code created by FP itself that you wish to access
the db with.

As for writing your own -- sure if you have the skills and time to do so. An
by skills I mean know that the pages are secure. But with this type of
product selling for under $20 and integrated into FP, how is it cost
effective for your customer or you?

These recommendation do not stand up to scrutiny.
 
J

Jim Cheshire

No one said anything about your product, Mike. I made statements concerning
security that will stand up to scrutiny by anyone who understands security.
If you don't, then I would seriously reconsider any decision to purchase a
product from you claiming to be secure.

--
Jim Cheshire
Jimco Add-ins
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
===================================
Co-author of Special Edition
Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
 
M

MD WebsUnlimited.com

What? I never said any thing about you mentioning my product. Apparently you
had it in mind though because of your reference to it here. It is my belief
that you are degrading FrontPage and all other products that would utilize
the _private directory. As you've told me before, "I believe I know what
your true motives are here."

Please stop loading up your gun and firing before you know what your aiming
at.
 
J

Jim Cheshire

For the record, I think it made it very clear that I was not talking about
your product. I made a general statement regarding security, and it is one
that is backed up by many other sources. As a matter of fact, FrontPage
2003 includes documentation to this effect as well.

My intent was NOT to discourage people from purchasing your product. I
stated to you that I was not talking about your product and you clearly
indicated that you didn't think that I was talking about your product.
However, you follow that up with a post saying that my point is to
discourage people from purchasing from you.

I receive dozens of e-mails from people everyday. None of them has been
from you. To reach me, you can browse to my Web site which is accessible by
any computer connected to the Internet. Your ability to post here means
that you also have the ability to contact me. Anyone that corresponds with
me knows that I am prompt to answer every single e-mail that I receive.

Your view as to what has happened here is, as usual, quite distorted. Your
threats against me in this public forum are not warranted nor welcomed. We
will deal with them appropriately.

--
Jim Cheshire
Jimco Add-ins
http://www.jimcoaddins.com
===================================
Co-author of Special Edition
Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
 
M

MD WebsUnlimited.com

Jim,

You need to re-read the entire thread. I never said at any time, before you
mentioned it, anything about my product. I said that you're statements about
using _private indicate that FP as a whole has the same security issues. You
where the first one to mention anything about products or business
practices. It is obvious what your intent was and you have a history of it.

But this thread alone is not the reason for taking action, not threats, it
is the fact that you're singling out my posts and are visibly trying to harm
the company and myself. You've been doing it for sometime now an we've
finally reach the end of our tolerance for your childishness.

As for email, I've made numerous requests in this NG to speak with you
privately and you've decline. I've written to your public emails and have
never received a response. As we both know email addresses can be routed to
the delete folder without ever seeing them. We did have a small exchange via
your support form but when I returned to continue the conversion -- no
response. Yesterday, I made 5 attempts to contact you at Microsoft over a 3
hour period, your phone was busy the entire time. This is the only venue
that you've chosen to converse in as it provides you with what, I believe,
you perceive to be a "righteous" position.

If we can not resolve it ourselves our Attorneys will have to and that is
not idle talk, Jim. You may have already learned I've contacted your
employer. Our Attorneys are being notified this morning and I would advise
that you see an Attorney if you wish to continue this.

Jim, I truly do no know how this got to this point but I plan to end it here
and now. These are not threats but advise of actions that are being taken.

Mike
 
T

Tom Pepper Willett

I believe these type of exchanges need to be taken offline and not continued
in the newsgroup. And I am referring to both parties. This is detrimental.


--
-----
Tom Pepper Willett
Microsoft MVP - FrontPage
----
| I have never mentioned any employer in this group. I have never posted
any
| post in this group and identified myself as the employee of any company.
| Everything that I post here is posted under Jimco Add-ins. For you to
drag
| my employer into this discussion is completely unwarranted. The last time
| you did this, I explained to you that Jimco Add-ins is not in any way
| associated with anyone but Jim Cheshire. Neither Microsoft nor anyone
else
| has anything to do with Jimco Add-ins and statements made under that
banner.
|
| Yes, you did contact me via e-mail and say that you wanted to "smooth
things
| over." We exchanged about three e-mails, Mike, and then you disappeared.
| You never did return. I do not auto-delete any e-mails, and when you have
| e-mailed me, I have responded.
|
| I am not at work because my wife just had a baby and is bed-ridden and I
am
| at home. However, my phone will never be busy. Our phone system does not
| work that way. I suspect that you may not be calling the right number,
but
| in any case, it is inappropriate to contact me at work for anything
| concerning what has happened in this group, and I have told you this many
| times in the past. My work phone and e-mail is for work business.
Nothing
| I do concerning FrontPage has any relation to my employer whatsoever.
|
| You certainly have the right to call me childish if you wish, Mike, but I
| think the evidence here says otherwise. You take issue with my statement
| that secure databases should be stored outside of the content area, and
you
| believe that statement is a slam against your product. I have never used
| your product and have no idea whether your product is limited in this way
or
| not. You say that FrontPage is, but it certainly is not. You can easily
| use a system DSN that points anywhere in the file system. There is no
| reason for me to believe that your product cannot do the same. Therefore,
| how could my statement have possibly been an attack against you? The
| answer: it wasn't.
|
| The bottom line is this; you and I have a tumultuous relationship, and
both
| of us know why. Our very first contact was under the circumstances as
this
| contact. It was when you contacted my employer to try and have my Web
site
| removed from the Internet. Since that time, you and I have been on a
rocky
| road. Why has it gotten to this? I will certainly admit that some part
of
| that is stubbornness on my part. However, what starts off poorly rarely
| ends well.
|
| I think perhaps the best course of action is to just drop it. However, I
| will ask again that you stop trying to drag my employer into your
| disagreements with me. There is absolutely no relation between Microsoft
| and Jimco Add-ins. If there is any harassment going on in this issue, it
is
| that alone and it must be stopped.
|
| --
| Jim Cheshire
| Jimco Add-ins
| http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| ===================================
| Co-author of Special Edition
| Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
|
|
| | > Jim,
| >
| > You need to re-read the entire thread. I never said at any time, before
| you
| > mentioned it, anything about my product. I said that you're statements
| about
| > using _private indicate that FP as a whole has the same security issues.
| You
| > where the first one to mention anything about products or business
| > practices. It is obvious what your intent was and you have a history of
| it.
| >
| > But this thread alone is not the reason for taking action, not threats,
it
| > is the fact that you're singling out my posts and are visibly trying to
| harm
| > the company and myself. You've been doing it for sometime now an we've
| > finally reach the end of our tolerance for your childishness.
| >
| > As for email, I've made numerous requests in this NG to speak with you
| > privately and you've decline. I've written to your public emails and
have
| > never received a response. As we both know email addresses can be routed
| to
| > the delete folder without ever seeing them. We did have a small exchange
| via
| > your support form but when I returned to continue the conversion -- no
| > response. Yesterday, I made 5 attempts to contact you at Microsoft over
a
| 3
| > hour period, your phone was busy the entire time. This is the only venue
| > that you've chosen to converse in as it provides you with what, I
believe,
| > you perceive to be a "righteous" position.
| >
| > If we can not resolve it ourselves our Attorneys will have to and that
is
| > not idle talk, Jim. You may have already learned I've contacted your
| > employer. Our Attorneys are being notified this morning and I would
advise
| > that you see an Attorney if you wish to continue this.
| >
| > Jim, I truly do no know how this got to this point but I plan to end it
| here
| > and now. These are not threats but advise of actions that are being
taken.
| >
| > Mike
| >
| >
| > | > > For the record, I think it made it very clear that I was not talking
| about
| > > your product. I made a general statement regarding security, and it
is
| > one
| > > that is backed up by many other sources. As a matter of fact,
FrontPage
| > > 2003 includes documentation to this effect as well.
| > >
| > > My intent was NOT to discourage people from purchasing your product.
I
| > > stated to you that I was not talking about your product and you
clearly
| > > indicated that you didn't think that I was talking about your product.
| > > However, you follow that up with a post saying that my point is to
| > > discourage people from purchasing from you.
| > >
| > > I receive dozens of e-mails from people everyday. None of them has
been
| > > from you. To reach me, you can browse to my Web site which is
| accessible
| > by
| > > any computer connected to the Internet. Your ability to post here
means
| > > that you also have the ability to contact me. Anyone that corresponds
| > with
| > > me knows that I am prompt to answer every single e-mail that I
receive.
| > >
| > > Your view as to what has happened here is, as usual, quite distorted.
| > Your
| > > threats against me in this public forum are not warranted nor
welcomed.
| > We
| > > will deal with them appropriately.
| > >
| > > --
| > > Jim Cheshire
| > > Jimco Add-ins
| > > http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| > > ===================================
| > > Co-author of Special Edition
| > > Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
| > >
| > >
| > > | > > > Boy you need to take a course in understanding what you read.
| > > >
| > > > I did say that I agreed that having the database outside of the web
| tree
| > > was
| > > > the most secure. However I also said that most ISP / WPP. do not
allow
| > for
| > > > it or they charge large sums to have it that way.
| > > >
| > > > Also if you were to follow this line of thinking all the way out
then
| > > > everyone that is using FrontPage to store a databases, email
results,
| > > etct.
| > > > should stop doing so immediately as it not secure accounting to Jim.
| and
| > > to
| > > > heck with conventions being used in FP 2003 / FP 2002 / FP 2000.
| You're
| > > > whole aim here is to discourage customer from using any Page
| Protection
| > > > package as they all store their database into the web.
| > > >
| > > > This is also true of eCommerce systems for the most post. If this
was
| a
| > > top
| > > > secret web site then yes there are a whole lot of security issue
that
| > > could
| > > > be address and would not be allowed in FP -- but were not dealing
with
| > Top
| > > > Secret information.
| > > >
| > > > If you keep taking pot shots at my business with these statements
and
| > it
| > > > border on be libelous behavior. It is already harassment. I plain
to
| > pass
| > > > them on to MS and our Lawyers. See prior messages.
| > > >
| > > > --
| > > > Mike -- FrontPage MVP '97-'02
| > > > J-Bots Plus 2002 End of Summer Sale You Save $20.00
| > > > http://www.websunlimited.com
| > > > FrontPage Add-ins Since '97 2003 / 2002 / 2000 Compatible
| > >
| >
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > > --
| > > > --------------------
| > > > If you think I'm doing a good job, let MS know at
(e-mail address removed)
| > > >
| > > >
| > > > | > > > > Absolutely amazing to me that you would find fault in a
| recommendation
| > > > that
| > > > > sensitive data be stored outside of the content area. Instead of
| > > > > disagreeing with me in a cordial way, you once again prove your
lack
| > of
| > > > > character.
| > > > >
| > > > > Keep posting, Mike. You give everyone good reason to refuse to do
| > > > business
| > > > > with you.
| > > > >
| > > > > --
| > > > > Jim Cheshire
| > > > > Jimco Add-ins
| > > > > http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| > > > > ===================================
| > > > > Co-author of Special Edition
| > > > > Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
| > > > >
| > > > >
| > > > > | > > > > > What? I never said any thing about you mentioning my product.
| > > Apparently
| > > > > you
| > > > > > had it in mind though because of your reference to it here. It
is
| my
| > > > > belief
| > > > > > that you are degrading FrontPage and all other products that
would
| > > > utilize
| > > > > > the _private directory. As you've told me before, "I believe I
| know
| > > what
| > > > > > your true motives are here."
| > > > > >
| > > > > > Please stop loading up your gun and firing before you know what
| your
| > > > > aiming
| > > > > > at.
| > > > > >
| > > > > >
| > > > > > --
| > > > > > Mike -- FrontPage MVP '97-'02
| > > > > > J-Bots Plus 2002 End of Summer Sale You Save $20.00
| > > > > > http://www.websunlimited.com
| > > > > > FrontPage Add-ins Since '97 2003 / 2002 / 2000 Compatible
| > > > >
| > > >
| > >
| >
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > > > > --
| > > > > > --------------------
| > > > > > If you think I'm doing a good job, let MS know at
| > (e-mail address removed)
| > > > > >
| > > > > >
| > > > > > | > > > > > > No one said anything about your product, Mike. I made
| statements
| > > > > > concerning
| > > > > > > security that will stand up to scrutiny by anyone who
| understands
| > > > > > security.
| > > > > > > If you don't, then I would seriously reconsider any decision
to
| > > > purchase
| > > > > a
| > > > > > > product from you claiming to be secure.
| > > > > > >
| > > > > > > --
| > > > > > > Jim Cheshire
| > > > > > > Jimco Add-ins
| > > > > > > http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| > > > > > > ===================================
| > > > > > > Co-author of Special Edition
| > > > > > > Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
| > > > > > >
| > > > > > >
| > > > > > > | > > > > > > > What you're suggesting here is that the company that you
work
| > for
| > > > (MS)
| > > > > > has
| > > > > > > > developed a system that allows for security holes.
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > The first version of FP that offered a save results
component
| > > saved
| > > > > the
| > > > > > > data
| > > > > > > > in _private and still does. Since the first version of FP
| that
| > > has
| > > > > > > offered
| > > > > > > > database results it saved the database in the web in known
| > folders
| > > > and
| > > > > > not
| > > > > > > > outside of the web.
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > Most ISP / WPP do not allow for a file area outside of the
web
| > > tree
| > > > > but
| > > > > > if
| > > > > > > > they do then yes use it. It does not mean that the product
you
| > > > > purchase
| > > > > > > can
| > > > > > > > not use that database. It does mean that you'll have to
| manually
| > > > tweak
| > > > > > the
| > > > > > > > code and that includes any code created by FP itself that
you
| > wish
| > > > to
| > > > > > > access
| > > > > > > > the db with.
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > As for writing your own -- sure if you have the skills and
| time
| > to
| > > > do
| > > > > > so.
| > > > > > > An
| > > > > > > > by skills I mean know that the pages are secure. But with
this
| > > type
| > > > of
| > > > > > > > product selling for under $20 and integrated into FP, how is
| it
| > > cost
| > > > > > > > effective for your customer or you?
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > These recommendation do not stand up to scrutiny.
| > > > > > > > --
| > > > > > > > Mike -- FrontPage MVP '97-'02
| > > > > > > > I-Bots Plus 2002 End of Summer Sale You Save $20.00
| > > > > > > > http://www.websunlimited.com
| > > > > > > > FrontPage Add-ins Since '97 2003 / 2002 / 2000 Compatible
| > > > > > >
| > > > > >
| > > > >
| > > >
| > >
| >
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| > > > > > > --
| > > > > > > > --------------------
| > > > > > > > If you think I'm doing a good job, let MS know at
| > > > (e-mail address removed)
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > >
| message
| > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > > Hi Jonered,
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > Sorry, I thought you were changing subjects and moving on
to
| > > > > > encrypting
| > > > > > > > > data. Assuming you are still talking about password
| > protecting,
| > > > > there
| > > > > > > are
| > > > > > > > > many solutions available to you out there. I'd carefully
| > > examine
| > > > > the
| > > > > > > > > license agreement with them however. Make sure that they
| will
| > > > stand
| > > > > > > > behind
| > > > > > > > > whatever level of security they provide. You don't want
to
| > pay
| > > > for
| > > > > a
| > > > > > > bug
| > > > > > > > in
| > > > > > > > > someone's product by opening a security hole in your site!
| > > > > Remember,
| > > > > > by
| > > > > > > > > using a product to do this, you are trusting your content
| with
| > > > that
| > > > > > > > company.
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > By far the best solution is to store usernames and
passwords
| > > > outside
| > > > > > of
| > > > > > > > your
| > > > > > > > > Web site content area. Using SQL Server is the best and
| most
| > > > secure
| > > > > > > > > solution. However, if you must use Access, you should
store
| > > your
| > > > > > Access
| > > > > > > > > database outside of your content area. You can store it
in
| > > > _private
| > > > > > or
| > > > > > > > some
| > > > > > > > > other folder where it cannot be browsed directly, but then
| you
| > > > must
| > > > > > rely
| > > > > > > > on
| > > > > > > > > your host to properly secure that folder, and many hosts
| open
| > up
| > > > > > > > permissions
| > > > > > > > > too much and allow people access to folders where they
| > shouldn't
| > > > be
| > > > > > > > allowed.
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > My personal recommendation would be to find a reputable
ASP
| > site
| > > > out
| > > > > > > there
| > > > > > > > > that provides tutorials on this kind of thing and write
your
| > > own.
| > > > > > It's
| > > > > > > > not
| > > > > > > > > hard to do, and by doing it yourself, you are guaranteed
to
| > know
| > > > > > exactly
| > > > > > > > > what's going on.
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > --
| > > > > > > > > Jim Cheshire
| > > > > > > > > Jimco Add-ins
| > > > > > > > > http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| > > > > > > > > ===================================
| > > > > > > > > Co-author of Special Edition
| > > > > > > > > Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > > > Jim,
| > > > > > > > > > I'm also working on a secure site (non-intranet). What
| > > > > > > > > > software is dependable and easy to use? What would you
| > > > > > > > > > recommend. (Never done secure site before.)
| > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message-----
| > > > > > > > > > >Sharon,
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >If you're using employee access pages, you might want
to
| > > > > > > > > > consider using the
| > > > > > > > > > >security on the Web site. It's going to be much more
| > > > > > > > > > reliable and robust
| > > > > > > > > > >than any third-party solution because it uses the OS-
| > > > > > > > > > level security.
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >Search on "frontpage password protect" in the Microsoft
| > > > > > > > > > KB at
| > > > > > > > > > >http://support.microsoft.com.
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >--
| > > > > > > > > > >Jim Cheshire
| > > > > > > > > > >Jimco Add-ins
| > > > > > > > > > >http://www.jimcoaddins.com
| > > > > > > > > > >===================================
| > > > > > > > > > >Co-author of Special Edition
| > > > > > > > > > >Using Microsoft FrontPage 2003
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >| > > > > > > > > > >> Does anyone have suggestions on add-ons so I can add
| > > > > > > > > > >> password protected pages to my website (employee
access
| > > > > > > > > > >> pages). I have tried J-Bots PagePro and can't get it
to
| > > > > > > > > > >> work and can't get support that I can understand.
| > > > > > > > > > >>
| > > > > > > > > > >> Thank you.
| > > > > > > > > > >>
| > > > > > > > > > >> sharon
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > > > >.
| > > > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > > >
| > > > > > >
| > > > > > >
| > > > > >
| > > > > >
| > > > >
| > > > >
| > > >
| > > >
| > >
| > >
| >
| >
|
|
 
M

MD WebsUnlimited.com

Jim,

I disagree.

I never contacted Microsoft asking them to remove your web site. I did
contact them yesterday asking them to review your actions of harassment and
to speak with your superiors.

Your employer is involved as you worked in PSS for FrontPage a direct link.
Received training that was not available to other ISVs, etc. You've
published articles on the MS web site using Jim Cheshire Microsoft and
others with just Jimco Jimco Addins -- you can confirm this on Google.com's
web site archives. You have the best of both worlds. It is obvious that MS
is aware of your dual role. If you have nothing to hide then why hide?

As for "smoothing things over", I've written and there as been no response.
I've asked that you call or I could call you. You refused. The only place
that you've been welling to dialog is on the FP NGs in public forums an
always with accusation of bad business practices, etc.

I believe that you are harassing me. In the month of Aug in the programming
group alone you made a total of 19 posts. Most of those where directly after
posts that I had made. You don't bother to assist first level questions.
That is harassment and I'm tired of it.

You may be right about the phone number not being correct but it was the one
I have. My decision to try to contact you via that number was to put an end
to this with out having to resort to legal actions. I do have your home
phone number but felt it inappropriate to bring this into your home.

I acknowledge that you're "stubborn".

Again, I never mention anything about any "product" you did that first.
Which leads me to believe that you had our product in mind in your entire
message on security and companies.

You said, " I think perhaps the best course of action is to just drop it.".
I've tried this and you've continued to harass, degrade, and undermine our
company. I've already stated what actions I'm taking. Your employer
Microsoft, has been contacted about your conduct. Our Attorneys have been
contacted and legal documents are presently being drawn up. What happens
after this point is entirely up to you.

Mike
Webs Unlimited, Inc.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top