See embedeed:
Hope this is useful to you. Let us know.
rms
Rasoul Khoshravan Azar wrote:
<snip
I presume this is an old way to produce PDF documents and as you explained
you can make them by Adobe Acrobat. Is there any special reason that you
produce PDF files through this way (not directly from inside the program,
let say word)
This is not that old and something I still do. Ghostscript has been
around for a while but it's still current. It converts PostScript to
PDF (including other powerful features). It will sometimes do a better
job than Adobe Acrobat does (smaller file sizes, handles graphics that
Adobe Acrobat fails, etc. I normally use Adobe Acobat since it's easy,
but when it fails and I need it, I use Ghostscript. For exmple, for
complexi Visio diagrams, often this approach results in a higher quality
representation of the paper document.
Ghostscript also a way that we provide an automated way for the entire
organisation to create PDFs. They just create PostScript files from
whatever program they have, email that file to a special email address,
and within a minute or so they get a a converted PDF file of that
PostScript file via return email. Adobe Acrobat can't do that.
Finally, Adobe Acobat is a bit pricey for many and Ghostscript is free.
Just one more question. What was the intention of Microsoft to put this
command in print windows?
I can't say how someone or some organisastion in Microsoft thinks or
thought about this. However, this capabilty to redirect output from a
process to a file is a basic capabilty of most operating systems and
Miccrosoft included this in their first operating system (DOS) -- or was
already there from the company they bought it from, I can't remember
that detail.