Catfish said:
It seems to me that everyone who responded is mainly a MS Projects user and
only know what descriptions are used in this program. I have been a scheduler
for 26 years with Halliburton. Most of that time I used Primavera. Only
recently have I started useing MSP. They are as different as night and day.
I still wish to thank you Juile.
Interesting you should say that now, Catfish. In a previous post, you
said, "Primavera is nothing more than buttons in a differant place.",
comparing it to Project. At the time, I queried you on this, saying
that Primavera must have removed about 75% of the features if it was
just Project with the buttons in a different place. You never replied.
Now it's "they are as different as night and day". So which is it?
Your issue here is that you used the wrong terminology and misled
others. No matter which scheduling software you use, an S curve is an S
curve, and a Resource Contour is a Resource Contour. Are you telling us
that in P3 a Resource Contour is called an S curve?
As to whether P3 is "better" than Project, there's no question that
it's more robust and has numerous features Project doesn't have (I
guess I answered the first question I asked you above). And it was
designed by people who understand scheduling far better than anyone at
MS. (And being MS people, they ignored the high-priced consultants they
hired to show them how to schedule). Nonetheless, I wouldn't want a
D-10 Cat to make a sandbox, or P3 to schedule building a compressor
station. With it's many flaws, Project has the best user interface I've
seen in scheduling software. That part MS developers do know! And it
doesn't take months to get started in. So they both have their place in
the market.
If you don't like Project, go back to P3! That is, if you, or your
current employer, can afford the $4500 per seat! (Or has it gone up
since I last checked it?)