Don Schmidt said:
I didn't. In the department we were in was one that required the
employee to do field trips of an area of responsibility which afforded
the employee opportunity to visit home where I suggested a bath before
returning to the office. This seemed to solve the problem for the
complaints ceased. If the problem continued I thought I would offer
the individual a position in one of our remote, single employee
offices.
Then there is the Army solution: A GI shower; setup seminar in a
location that required an overnight stay and let the peers persuade
the individual "Cleanliness is next to Godliness."
(For those who don't know what a GI shower is; corn brushes, steel
wool, soap and cold water administered by those who are interested in
your cleanliness).
A variation of a GI shower from times past.
Smearing the offender with all the contents of a 1lb (1/2 Kilo) tube of
Gestetner ink and throwing all the offending clothes in a bathtub
resulted in the victim being sweet smelling for a few days at least. Of
course the ink was rubbed in hardest in the most difficult to clean
places.
The decision to apply this penalty was made by a Kangaroo Court
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court )
where the court was composed of barracks mates of the accused .
A Gestetner (for the youngsters here) was a machine for making copies
using wax masters before copiers were invented.
The ink came in tubes like a large toothpaste tube and was BLACK and
greasy.