I think it depends on the question and the FAQ provided.
Referencing a FAQ that doesn't directly answer the question but the
answer can be found as a blurb in small print is not very helpful. Nor
do I think it's helpful to provide a link to a FAQ simply because
contains a keyword the poster used and it has nothing to do with the
question asked.
But I agree, a FAQs that directly answer a question is more helpful
than supplying an answer in plain text.
I personally prefer to supply a poster with more than just a link. I
think most need a little more information on why a link to a FAQ is
being offered along with some reassurance that I understand the
question being asked. I know I tend to skip over posts that contain
only links and look for posts with a little 'meat' when I'm searching
for answers on Google Groups. A little enticement for why one should
view a FAQ is always helpful.
<soapbox>
Speaking of Google Group searches, what I find most annoying are the
'regurgitation' answers. Those are when someone has used Google Groups
to find the answer in a past thread. Not that I have a problem with
this, since that's what Google Groups search is for and I encourage
using it, but what I find annoying is when someone copies an answer I
previously provided.
Sheesh, if you are copying my answer verbatim then give me the credit.
At the very least rewrite it so it doesn't sounds like me.
</soapbox>
Not that my soapbox has anything to do with supplying links to FAQs
but after encountering several posts of this nature the last few days
while catching up on weeks of posts I'm a bit annoyed right now.
Although I'm not sure if 'annoyed' is necessarily the correct
description. I also find reading a reply that sounds like me a little
unnerving. <g>
~~~~~~~~~~
Beth Melton