Which version?

[DMC]

Which version of Publisher should I use if I have Windows ME?

 

[JoAnn Paules [MSFT MVP]]

2002 is the last one you can use.

 

[Ed Bennett]

Which version of Publisher should I use if I have Windows ME?

If it will convince you, I STRONGLY recommend upgrading to Windows XP. It
allows you to run the latest version of Publisher and it wil dramatically
decrease the rate of spyware infections on your computer.

 

[Gene]

Of course, it does mean you have

to spend money on hardware too.... ;o)

Not if daddy buys it for you beacause you sit around all day. This is an
office newsgroup by the way, nothing to do with mac
IFC

 

[Ed Bennett]

I *STRONGLY* recommend upgrading to Mac OS X Tiger. OK, it doesn't
allow you to run the latest version of Publisher, but it *will*
decrease the rate of spyware infections on your computer to zero. Of
course, it does mean you have to spend money on hardware too.... ;o)

Funny.

 

[Ed Bennett]

Not if daddy buys it for you beacause you sit around all day. This is
an office newsgroup by the way, nothing to do with mac

Actually, this is a Publisher newsgroup.
And there is Mac Office. No Publisher, though.

This is a Publisher newsgroup, by the way, nothing to do with sitting around
and doing jack sh*t but blast one particular regular.

 

[Don]

"nothing to do with sitting around and doing jack sh*t but blast one

particular regular"

Just like that regular does to countless others, with the exception that
most people don't deserve her bs.Tick does deserve it.

 

[Ed Bennett]

Just like that regular does to countless others, with the exception
that most people don't deserve her bs.Tick does deserve it.

Actually, Ms Cake actually normally includes some kind of Publisher-related
information in her posts, or directs them to an appropriate group.

Do two wrongs make a right? If you know Ms Cake's behaviour is so bad, why
do you emulate it?

 

[Don]

As I said, what comes around goes around. Your condoning her behavior by
defending her actions is right? If her behavior is bad in the first place
you should be berating her in the first place?

 

[Ed Bennett]

As I said, what comes around goes around.

I hope to not hear you complain if someone starts to persecute you online
then.

Perhaps your actions might be a little more acceptable if you only replied
with your personal attacks to posts where Ms Cake is actually rude or
offensive. She has been more helpful in many of today's posts and has not
attacked the OP, merely made suggestions, and you have still posted your
canned response.
You might even consider posting a response to the OP's question once in a
while.

 

[Jim]

<"I hope to not hear you complain if someone starts to persecute you <online
<then"
There's no need to "persecute" me, I don't treat people who are asking for
help like sh*t.

<"Perhaps your actions might be a little more acceptable if you only
<replied
<with your personal attacks to posts where Ms Cake is actually rude or
offensive"
I don't need anyone telling me what actions are acceptable or not or else I
wouldn't do it would I? As for her being rude or offensive she has endlessly
berated others for off topic remarks hence, my response.

<"She has been more helpful in many of today's posts and has not
<attacked the OP, merely made suggestions, and you have still posted <your
canned response"
Again a suggestion that's OT and my "canned" response is far less
antagonistic than most of her posts,AND I don't rail on all her posts, look
around and see.

<"You might even consider posting a response to the OP's question <once in a
while."
How do you know that I don't post suggestions? That is an assumption, some
thing that I don't have to make in concern to Ticks posts because they are
mostly rude.

..

 

[JoAnn Paules [MSFT MVP]]

You're right, we don't know whether or not you've helped anyone because you
change your name frequently.

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]

<"I hope to not hear you complain if someone starts to persecute you
<online
<then"
There's no need to "persecute" me, I don't treat people who are asking for
help like sh*t.

<"Perhaps your actions might be a little more acceptable if you only
<replied
<with your personal attacks to posts where Ms Cake is actually rude or
offensive"
I don't need anyone telling me what actions are acceptable or not or else
I wouldn't do it would I? As for her being rude or offensive she has
endlessly berated others for off topic remarks hence, my response.

<"She has been more helpful in many of today's posts and has not
<attacked the OP, merely made suggestions, and you have still posted <your
canned response"
Again a suggestion that's OT and my "canned" response is far less
antagonistic than most of her posts,AND I don't rail on all her posts,
look around and see.

<"You might even consider posting a response to the OP's question <once in
a while."
How do you know that I don't post suggestions? That is an assumption, some
thing that I don't have to make in concern to Ticks posts because they are
mostly rude.

.

 

[DMC]

Thank you!

2002 is the last one you can use.

--

JoAnn Paules
MVP Microsoft [Publisher]

Which version of Publisher should I use if I have Windows ME?