I
Ilja Mihailovs
My enterprise uses custom application written by a external
company. The executable connects to an Access database. The application is
NOT designed in a Access itself, it only uses it as a database. Everything
(including executable and a DB) is stored in a share on a server. Two users
simultaneously are working with the executable (launching it from a share).
Executable works with the DB, so to me it is no use in splitting the DB. One
user has extremely good response times (data is extracted quite fast). In
controversy, second user has to wait 1-2 minutes for the data to appear. Both
PCs are configured in the same way, no differences there.
Can someone suggest any share / DB tuning approach?
I believe DB splitting is none of use here.
company. The executable connects to an Access database. The application is
NOT designed in a Access itself, it only uses it as a database. Everything
(including executable and a DB) is stored in a share on a server. Two users
simultaneously are working with the executable (launching it from a share).
Executable works with the DB, so to me it is no use in splitting the DB. One
user has extremely good response times (data is extracted quite fast). In
controversy, second user has to wait 1-2 minutes for the data to appear. Both
PCs are configured in the same way, no differences there.
Can someone suggest any share / DB tuning approach?
I believe DB splitting is none of use here.