MS Publisher 2002

B

Bobc

I think Publisher 2002 is not nearly as good as Publisher
2000. Does anybody agree with me?
 
J

JL_Amerson

Before I took the advice of many of the people in this group and updated my
video drivers, I would have agreed somewhat. Not now. I prefer 2002.

May I ask what issues you have with Pub 2002?
 
E

Ed Bennett

After managing to set up OE-QuoteFix on his new PC, Ed reads a message
from Bobc said:
I think Publisher 2002 is not nearly as good as Publisher
2000. Does anybody agree with me?
Click to expand...

Some people do. I don't.
I like the new WordArt, especially. Publisher 2003 is definitely an
improvement on 2002 though.
 
°

°°°MS°Publisher°°°

Publisher 2000 is a major problem to find what was good about it. I doubt
there is one redeeming feature in Publisher 2000 over Publisher 97.
Publisher 98 is called Publisher 49 as it was only half a program, and
Publisher 2000 should be referred to as Publisher 1333 - Publisher 1 1/3rd.

To date, the best Publisher versions are 2.0a, 97 and 2003 with added extras
and ketchup/tomato sauce.

--
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Images are pixelated when saving to PDF 0
Cannot do anything after zooming - Publisher Lite on Mac 0
I can create Publisher documents, but I can not open / read them. 0
Publisher adding blank page when printing my booklet... 2
Some pages of publisher do not get printed with MS PDF 1
Text missing from Publisher document. 1
Publisher 2000 will not "Save" or "Save AS" and says MS Publisher not Responding. 0
Installing Publisher 2003 on machine with MS 2007 (less Publisher) 1

Top