Well now.
Since I am a long time standing Publisher MVP as well, second only to
Brian, I suppose I will weigh in here with the wisdom that comes with my
age, rather then ignore this sideshow foray as I typically do.
I agree 100% with Brian and his analogy is right on. And yes the MS
Community does not have "moderators". That is why you are free to do and
say as you please. The MVP role is to provide assistance and to have a
recognition by the poster that the response is credible.
I have to add something that I believe everyone overlooks.... we don't
know this poster. But most importantly we don't know what brought them
here. It very well could be someone that has been around and used this
group for some time. And though unrelated a topic it was, they likely
could have posted here simply from a comfort factor. All of us "regulars"
are guilty of that on occasion. Of course we know that the subject should
be prefixed with "OT", but then we are forum savvy.
Handling an OT post depends on context as well. I consider the context of
the question before a response.
Now with this post I would have given an answer to the best of my
knowledge and followed up by informing the poster that this was OT for
this group and if they needed more assistance they needed to repost to
the appropriate forum.
I think the attacking responder in question here is a problem. But then
we all have to learn to live with and deal with people we can't stand
and/or can't agree with. That is the reality of life. With that in mind
my opinion is that the attack on the attacker was un-called for.
Understandable, yes. But sometimes one has to be the better individual. I
believe that the attacking post should have been ignored. And I believe
the attack post on the attacker should have been ignored as well. Though
I can understand the emotions that drove that.
In the end the simple truth is, the attacker was technically correct. And
it's view as an "attack" is our perception. And it's our perception
because we truly believe in what we do. The original poster may have
thought nothing of it. Again, perception.
Since we are human ( I hope) we all have perceptions, emotions, and
degrees of stupidity. Sometimes one should take a breath before writing a
post. Honestly, many times I've wanted to tell a poster how much I simply
wanted to shake them silly because they were (in my view of course),
stupid. Sometimes you have to step out of the forum for a bit and then
you remember that posting something of no help to anyone is stupid and
bad policy.
Here in our little online world we need to keep our emotions and our
stupidity in check, just like we do in our normal offline lives (assuming
we all have one), least this little home of ours melts down into pure
chaos and sideshows, and we lose sight of it's purpose, it's daily
vision, which is to provide the best support (and the cheapest) to the
Publisher customer. Period.
David Bartosik - [MSFT MVP]
www.publishermvps.com
www.davidbartosik.com
Brian Kvalheim said:
While I am "technically" not a moderator (nor are the other MVP's), I
have spent the better portion of the last decade in these Microsoft
Publisher newsgroups. It seems that I have become a "fixture". I have
always had a comfort level with these particular groups. I thoroughly
enjoy assisting others, whether they are looking for Publisher help or
stumbled into the wrong group and point them in the right direction (or
even offer to help them with their non-publisher related item).